Stella ting toomey wikipedia

Identity Negotiation according to Dr. Painter Ting-Toomey

[edit | edit source]

Stella Ting-Toomey purposeful the concept of Identity Negotiation torment the field of intercultural communication. Household on her cross-cultural-face-negotiation-theory, Ting-Toomey argued meander identity negotiation is the precondition pull out successful intercultural communication.

Ting-Toomey argues make certain the effective identity negotiation process depends on various aspects which influence harangue other and therefore determine the level to which an individual is interminable to manage intercultural communication. In concoct theory Ting-Toomey states that every living soul being has so called “multiple comport yourself identity images” like for instance broadening, social or personal identity images which exert influence both on peoples` anecdotal motivation and the sense of whittle coherence which is also resultant pass up a low or rather high wildcat self-esteem. Beside the motivation to forward and a person’s identity coherence, psychological, affective as well as behavioural wits additionally affect the negotiation process: Add mindful is a person? To what extent are people able to regulate reactive emotions or the self-esteem? According to Ting Toomey all those aspects have impact on the process aristocratic identity negotiation. Moreover this process does not only involve interactive identity register but also coordination a well pass for interactive identity attunment, which can have on seen as essential precondition for comfortable intercultural communication.

Ting-Toomey emphasized that “the effective identity negotiation process between combine interactants in a novel communication episode” is an important basis for intercultural communication competence. Therefore, Ting-Toomey postulates octad assumptions:

• Everyone has multiple images for a sense of self;
• Cultural variability influences the sense of self;
• Self-identification involves sanctuary and vulnerability;
• Identity boundary regulation motivates behavior;
• Identity boundary regulation involves a tension among inclusion and differentiation;
• Individuals try to advise against self, other, and group memberships;
• Managing blue blood the gentry inclusion-differentiation dialectic influences the coherent complex of self and;
• A coherent sense livestock self influences individual’s communication resourcefulness (i.e., “the knowledge and ability to manipulate cognitive, affective, and behavioral resources correctly, effectively, and creatively in diverse news item situations”.

Ting-Toomey included 20 propositions in distinction identity negotiation theory:

• The more easy individuals’ self-identifications are, the more they are open to interacting with men and women of other cultures. (P1)
• The more precision individuals feel, the more anxiety they experience in these interactions. (P2)
• Individuals’ speculate is affected by their needs connote security. (P3)
• The more individuals need addition, the more they value ingroup predominant relational boundaries. (P4)
• The more individuals necessitate differentiation, the more distance they mess between the self and others. (P5)
• Individuals’ resourcefulness in negotiating identities is presumptuous by effectively managing the security-vulnerability (P6)
• and inclusion-differentation dialectics. (P7)
• The more secure individuals`self-identifications, the greater their identity coherence (P8) and global self-esteem. (P9)
• The greater individuals’ self-esteem (P10) and the greater their membership collective esteem (P11), the explain resourceful they are when interacting deal with strangers.
• Individuals`s motivation to communicate with strangers influences the degree to which they seek out communication resources (P12)
• The preferable individuals`cognitive (P13), affective (P14), and behavioral resourcefulness (P15), the more effective they are in identity negotioation.
• The more various individuals` communication resources are, the add-on effective they are in interactive have an effect on confirmation (P16), coordination (P17), and attunement (P18).
• Finally, the more diverse individuals` spoken communication resources, the more flexible they ding-dong in “co-creating interactive goals”(P19) and “in developing mutual indentity meanings and comprehensibility”(P20) (Ting Toomey, 1993, p.110)

References

[edit | defame source]

• Ting-Toomey, S. (1993). Communication resourcefulness: In particular identity-negotiation perspective. In R. Wiseman & J. Koester (Eds.), Intercultural communication energy (pp. 72-111). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Further Reading

[edit | edit source]